Defining the “aging athlete” is difficult, especially in the conventional way with a number representing age. But more importantly, this is a highly personal matter--when am I going to be an old athlete? Each of us knows it’s going to happen; we just don’t know when.
When I was in my 40s I thought that perhaps I would be an “aging athlete” by age 50. In my 50s I was pretty much sure it would show up any day. Now at 68 I’m still waiting for the other shoe to fully drop, but seeing signs that its on the way down. On the positive side, I’m putting out nearly the same power numbers as in 1994, at age 50, when I got my first power meter. Many other things have changed in those 18 years. For example, my training and nutrition have improved remarkably in that period while lifestyle stress has decreased significantly.
That's not to say that the changes, or lack thereof, have all been positive or even neutral. I now recover much more slowly than when I was younger. I also find it more difficult to add muscle mass. What and when I eat has a greater effect on how I train than ever before. And there are many more, performance-lowering changes taking place. The net result of all of this is an overall drop in performance. But the bottom hasn't fallen out - yet.
When I review the performance data of national-class, age group time trialists, runners and swimmers I see that there is a steady and obvious drop in performance times starting around age 35. But this is rather small, and barely noticeable. The trend remains negative over the next 30 years. The biggest decline in performance occurs around and after age 70 in all three sports.
But this doesn't tell the whole story. Those who set the 70+ age group records did not have the advantages that my generation, and especially those who follow me, have had. Besides training methodology and nutrition, equipment improvements also give those of us who are younger a long-term advantage.
Then there is the competition factor. Those who set their 70+ age group national records did not have the depth of competition in their earlier years that the Baby Boomers have enjoyed (I use the term “enjoyed” loosely here because greater competition means harder training and more race suffering). This competition has groomed the up-and-coming older athletes to compete at a higher level than ever before seen in sports.
Of course, regardless of age, there are only three things one can do to improve endurance performance: raise aerobic capacity (VO2max), elevate lactate (anaerobic) threshold as a percentage of VO2max and improve economy which has to do with how efficiently one uses energy.
Greater competition and better nutrition have led to meaner and leaner aging athletes who have higher aerobic capacities than their aging predecessors as a result. The growth of technology has allowed those on the leading edge of the Baby Boomer generation to maintain a higher lactate or anaerobic threshold since it can now be easily measured and appropriately stressed with somewhat more precise training methods. There has also been an emphasis on technique and efficiency in sport which didn’t exist 20 years ago. So aging athletes are also more economical now than ever before. Improved coaching and training information available through the Internet has played a major role in these improvements.
Rather than discussing “aging” athletes, it may be more precise to talk about “old” athletes. I'll come back to that topic in an upcoming post.




Joe - you are among the most highly motivated, highly disciplined athletes I have ever known. Most of us know why, and even how, to accomplish selected goals but when it comes to just getting it done we fall short.
Perhaps you could share with us the secrets to being able to discipline ouselves as you have be it with our diets, training intensity, rest, and even lifestyle choices. One 2012 Olympic athlete was quoted as saying, "I haven't had dessert in two years." Where to we get that? Thanks.
John
John Post, MD
Medical Director, Training Bible Coaching
Posted by: john | 08/09/2012 at 01:51 PM
Hey John--Thanks for your kind comments. I have dessert every day, but it's usually Paleo. :)
Posted by: Joe Friel | 08/09/2012 at 02:35 PM
Thanks so much for the inspiration. One way I measure my strength to weight ratio are pull ups. The Navy SEALS could care less about the bench press or squat. Their minimum pull ups for their yearly fitness test is 18 pull ups. I am very near 66 and easily did 10 slow up and slow down pull ups this morning. I actually did a grand total of 66 to match my age. I follow the maxim of "workout as if your life depended on it."
Posted by: Joseph | 08/09/2012 at 03:11 PM
Joe, excellent writing, I'm reading this with great interest, as I am one of those aging athletes. I use to be extremely competitive in my younger years, but over-trained hopelessly until I discovered your training bible.
Long story short, I stopped riding for approximately 11 years and started again at 59 years old. Following your bible I have now done 12 weeks of base training. The aging thing that dissapoints me is my maximum heart rate seems to be around 167, compared to 182, 11 years ago and I guess this will be an indicator of proportional performance decrease?
Also, to get above a heart rate of 160, I have to recover really well, is this normal or an idicator of doing too much? I do feel really good on the bike though and seem to handle zone 3 without much effort.
Posted by: Willem J Martins | 08/10/2012 at 06:24 AM
Great blog topic. I am among my " aging" athlete girlfriends right now. We are all "over the hill" and then some, but will all be on our bikes shortly.
I am privileged to have known Joe most of his 68 years and only wish I could be as disciplined as he is. Keep on being my life's example.
Posted by: Joyce friel | 08/10/2012 at 08:23 AM
Hi Willem--My suggestion would be to give little attention to heart rate and pay much more attention to power. Heart rate has little to do with performance. Basically, all you want is a low heart rate and a high power output. Being focused on heart rate is ultimately a losing proposition as it leads us to think we need to have high heart rates. That's not what you want.
Posted by: Joe Friel | 08/10/2012 at 03:06 PM
Thanks for the post Joe. I've used your best triathlon ever book for the past two years and have posted 2 personal bests in the full Vineman and have been on the podium in my age group in 3 out of the last 4 half or full ironman distance races I've done. As an aging athlete I look forward to training smarter and getting faster. I'm 55 and my long term goal is to qualify for Kona when I turn 60. I too have noticed that I don't recover as fast as I used to and need more rest than in the past to absorb the training. I have raced ironman distance races for the past 3 years and plan on taking a year off from that and just doing half and shorter distances next year to give my body a little rest and work on my weaknesses. I have seen some talk of "long term periodization" (or multi-year periodization if you will) and think this might help me as well. If you have any additional information about that and how that might work with aging athletes I would appreciate you writing about it. Thanks again. - Mark
Posted by: Mark Maurer | 08/11/2012 at 08:18 AM
G'day from Australia, Joe!
We are the same age and, if that's a current photo ^ you're doing a lot better than me! I am in awe of you for the ride you just completed. I saw mention of the section from Telluride to Mancos - an 'easy day' - and I saw what I thought was minus 3800 feet of climbing and I thought, "yeah, I could handle that". After cleaning my glasses, I realised that it was 'approximately'! And was that with an overnight pack on the bike, too?
Joe, I just wanted to ask whether you have had any major health problems in your 'first 68 years', as that has been my experience in recent years, despite my lanky appearance (6ft tall, 165lbs currently - and never more than 176lbs).
Finally, the heart problems appear to be (mostly) a thing of the past and I am able to get out and do a modicum of exercise but I'm still well short of being able to ride the distances you obviously cover - and it's not from lack of will (well, maybe sometimes).
Perhaps the carbon fibre frame (arriving this week) will enable me to complete longer rides, as my old bones aren't coping too well with the jolting from the aluminium alloy one. However, search as I may, I will NEVER find hills within 100 miles of here (Grenfell, N.S.W) that come within a bull's roar of your wonderful Rockies!
I raced (road and track) on and off for around 34 years from 1963 but, these days, I just ride to keep the inevitable at bay as long as possible - and because I still love it!
I 'sort of' follow a book written by a couple of Yanks, "The High Performance Heart" and I definitely use an HRM - it's a 'must' for me.
All the best to you, Joe,
from another 'war baby', Brian
Posted by: Brian Ward | 08/11/2012 at 07:21 PM
Brian - You are doing great! Keep it up. Someone told me that we should exercise as if our lives depended on it. He was right.
Posted by: Joe Friel | 08/11/2012 at 08:41 PM
Joe-- appreciate your blog and books- very inspirational and informative. I FINALLY got a Computrainer (yesterday) for my "almost-50th" birthday. (No, I couldn't wait another year!) I took the financial plunge because I think the older one gets, training & recovery by utilizing hard numbers, rather than by feel and HR, appears to be even more important. An 80+ year old athlete featured in a film about Kona stated he went anaerobic (nearly) every day and that is why he was where he was. I'm following your lead as well as that of the TRULY older athletes' ;)
Posted by: kck | 08/13/2012 at 08:13 AM