I’ve beat around the intervals bush long enough. Let’s get to what I’m sure you’re most interested in: types of intervals and how to best incorporate them into your training. This is a rather massive topic given that there are so many ways of doing them based on periodization, the purpose of the workout, the athlete’s fitness and level of experience, and the sport. So what I’m going to explain here is fairly basic and I won’t go into all of the subtle nuances.
But first I want to make sure we are using the same terminology. That will make explanations a bit easier. Let’s start with the word “intervals.” What this actually refers to is the time between the hard efforts—the recovery breaks or pauses between the hard efforts. In most sports athletes have come to refer to the hard effort as the “interval” but that’s actually a misuse of the word. It’s so common to use the word that way, however, that it’s now accepted by most except some of the really hardcore, sport-science types. So to hold down the confusion I will call the hard efforts “work intervals” (WI) and the low efforts between them as “recovery intervals” (RI). I’ll also refer to the total accumulated time or distance or kilojoules of the work intervals within a single session as the “work interval volume” (WIV).
If you need further explanations of the intensity of the WI and RI as used in the following discussion please go here.
I should also point out here that the speed, velocity, pace, heart rate, power, or effort of the RI is also important. It doesn’t have to be extremely easy or slow as you’ll see below. (By the way, it’s not a good idea to make the RI completely passive as active recovery has been shown to better sustain WI power output [Connolly].) The primary purpose of doing intervals is to prepare for the stresses of the race. And since in a race you don’t get recovery intervals, the interval session some how needs to gradually, over several sessions, take on the characteristics of the race. For this reason I like to keep the intensity of the WI racelike while gradually increasing the intensity of the RI. Or the other option is to keep the intensity of the WI the same while making it shorter.
These then are the most critical components of an interval session save one—the speed, velocity, pace, heart rate, power, or effort of the WI. Every interval workout needs to precisely define these variables relative to the purpose of the session.
In Part 2 of this series I reminisced about how my college track coach had us doing intervals every day without defining the components with the single exception of distance. Each WI was 400 meters. Pace, RI, and WIV were undefined. That made for a frustrating session from the athlete’s point of view. There were lots of unanswered questions, the most basic of which was, what is the purpose of this workout? I’m sure the coach would have answered this simplistically as, “to make you faster.” Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way. If most of the components of an interval workout are undefined then the likelihood of achieving something of value is greatly reduced. If the parts of the interval session are random then it is unlikely that the intended benefits will be realized.
But I’m starting to digress. Let’s get back to the subtle nuances of intervals by sport. A given interval workout isn’t going to be the same for all sports. For example, there’s a tremendous difference in the same type of interval workout between swimming, cycling, and running. Recovery is rather fast in the water but is much slower when running. Bike recovery between intervals is some place between that of swimming and running. Similarly, the WIV for a given workout can be longer in the pool than when running. The risk of injury is far greater when running so one must be more conservative with a run interval session’s volume. Again, cycling falls between these two extremes. And there are other subtle nuances by sport such as the relative need to maintain technique when fatigued.
One more explanation before I get into examples of interval workouts (with my apologies for the delay). As described in my Training Bible books, I organize training periodization and all workouts according to 6 “abilities.” These are aerobic endurance, muscular force, speed skills, muscular endurance, anaerobic endurance, and sprint power. The accompanying triangular graphic is how I illustrated this in my books. (Thanks to Dr. Tudor Bompa for introducing this concept to me many, many years ago.) The 6 abilities are divided into 2 categories—basic and advanced. The corners of the triangle are the basic abilities: aerobic endurance, muscular force, and speed skill. For most athletes in most sports the basic abilities are the ones that the Base period (or Accumulation block) focuses on. Note that this is not always the case, which you will see later. In the Build period (or Transmutation block) the focus of training is usually the advanced abilities: muscular endurance, anaerobic endurance, and sprint power. Again, that’s not always the case.
Okay, I think I’ve given you enough background to understand what I’m going to explain below. So let’s get on with the details of intervals using examples based on the 6 abilities. In this part I’ll cover the basic abilities and in Part 5 the advanced abilities. Bear in mind that what I’ll describe here is my way of training athletes using intervals. It’s not the only way or even necessarily the best way for you. But if you follow my training system as described in the Training Bible books then I’d strongly suggest you do intervals as described here as that ensures all of the pieces will fit together nicely. Training is much like putting a jigsaw puzzle together. Taking pieces from various other puzzles and trying to put them together simply makes for a mess. Whatever training system you use, I’d suggest following it rather closely.
Aerobic endurance intervals are intended to improve the athlete’s ability to use oxygen to produce movement. When aerobic endurance is improving many things are occurring, such as an increase in stroke volume (blood pumped per beat), aerobic enzymes, mitochondria, and capillarization to name but a few. As with al of the interval workouts I’ll describe below, there are many ways of doing aerobic endurance intervals. This is just my favorite.
WI duration: 20 minutes.
WI intensity: Coggan’s power or my pace, heart rate or perceived exertion zone 3
RI duration: 5 minutes.
RI intensity: Zone 2 power, pace, heart rate, or perceived exertion.
WIV: 20-120 minutes.
Periodization: I almost always have athletes do this workout in the late Base period and I usually include 1-3 such intervals as the latter part of another workout in the Build period.
Measuring progress: When the average WI output-input ratio (power or speed divided by heart rate) stabilizes for several consecutive sessions and WI decoupling is low then I know AE is well-established. “Decoupling” essentially means that power or pace and heart rate remain steady relative to one another. (To learn more about decoupling do a search on the home page of my blog.) The athlete isn’t ready to progress to advanced ability workouts until AE is excellent.
Muscular force interval workouts increase the athlete’s ability to overcome resistance usually in the form of water, wind, and hills. These are typically short repetitions done using some sort of resistance such as a high gear (bike), steep hill, strong head wind, rubber tubing (swim), or drag devices (swim, run). Here is a workout I commonly have athletes do.
WI duration: 10-20 seconds.
WI intensity: Near maximal.
RI duration: 3 minutes.
RI intensity: zone 1
WIV: There is great variance in how much of this an athlete can manage. It should certainly end whenever power or speed drops by more than 5%. This is also a high-risk workout that can easily result in injury so it’s best to be conservative with WIV, especially early in the season.
Periodization: Commonly done in the Base period and seldom if at all in Build.
Measuring progress: The athlete should be noticeably able to generate more power or speed in the same conditions.
Speed skills sessions are intended to improve efficiency by improving movement skills. This usually involves doing drills to refine or learn a technique. Drills are common in swimming. A typical cycling drill is to increase the pedaling cadence in a low gear to a max level for a few seconds every few minutes while relaxing the body. Runners do “strides” workouts in which they run fast, usually down a slight hill, while focusing on one aspect of technique such as foot position at strike. There many, many drills for each sport.
WI duration: 10-20 seconds.
WI intensity: Very low resistance (gear, grade, etc) but progressing gradually to higher arm/leg turnover rates.
RI duration: 90-120 seconds.
RI intensity: Very easy (walking, spinning, slow swimming).
WIV: 2-6 minutes (the drill must stop if technique is the least bit compromised).
Periodization: This may be done throughout the season but is most effective and most used early in the Base period.
Measuring progress: The drills should become easier or an expert with a trained eye for technique in the sport subjectively determines that there is progress. This may involve the use of video to compare before and after technique.
Reference
Connolly, D.A. & S.J. Baker. 1997. Effects of recovery mode on power output in repeated bouts of short term, high intensity exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29(50:S1496.
Since I'm currently in the Build phase, I won't be doing these workouts immediately. But I will incorporate these into my winter Base training.
I remember that you posted before about how Zone 3 Base training might be more beneficial than Zone 2 for experienced athletes. After three years of tri training, I think I'll do better by adding these Zone 3 aerobic intervals in Base than staying in Zone 2. Thanks for the detailed info.
Posted by: Michael H. | 08/07/2011 at 10:36 AM
I looked at your Training Bible and the Aerobic Endurance interval description in the appendices says to achieve Zone 5b. Why the difference in this blog which says to achieve zone 3?
Posted by: Art Zimmet | 08/07/2011 at 11:19 AM
Art Z--You're looking at 'anaerobic endurance' in the book.
Posted by: Joe Friel | 08/07/2011 at 01:49 PM
Fantastic post, Joe. Thanks for all the detail.
Posted by: Matt | 08/08/2011 at 07:06 AM
In the 4th paragraph, ending with the sentence "Or the other option is to keep the intensity of the WI the same while making it shorter." I assume you mean RI, not WI. Is that correct?
Posted by: Bruce | 08/08/2011 at 07:40 AM
Joe,
Can you post a link to decoupling please there are 12pages of results for it in the search
Ian
Posted by: Loonytoon | 08/08/2011 at 07:56 AM
Loonytoon-- http://www.trainingbible.com/joesblog/2009/08/intervals-tempo-and-decoupling.html
Posted by: Joe Friel | 08/08/2011 at 03:54 PM
Bruce--Yes, RI. Sorry for typo.
Posted by: Joe Friel | 08/08/2011 at 03:54 PM
Sort of off topic, but when can we get an example of workouts/intervals using the block training method? Like how many days on and then off for recovery etc., along with some examples off workouts for the different types of workouts. Thanks
Posted by: Clinton Campbell | 08/08/2011 at 08:32 PM
Clinton C--Recovery varies primarily based on the individual's capacity for training stress, more so than as a function of periodization.
Posted by: Joe Friel | 08/09/2011 at 04:47 PM
Hello Joe,
Once we've achieved the coupling of our heart reate and speed in running. How can we increase the speed that enables to have a coupled heart rate ?
With aerobic endurance intervals I guess ? Am I right ?
Thank you for your job.
Clement
Posted by: Clement | 08/10/2011 at 03:01 AM
Hi Clement--Yes, I believe the starting point is aerobic endurance intervals. I've seen extraodinarily big changes in FTPa/Pw after a few weeks of that. But once it plateaus with this type of training greater stress must be introduced. That would be muscular endurance intervals which I will get to next - when time allows.
Posted by: Joe Friel | 08/10/2011 at 07:05 PM
Hi Joe, in your bible you have force workouts (hill climbs for bike and run)going up to zone 5 in the base period. Is that still relevant and ok for your heart rate to climb? In this blog and a previous you have a different force workout of just the 20 secs with long rest. This doesnt appear as a workout in the bible.
Thanks - check the blog each day!
Posted by: Darren Knight | 08/11/2011 at 06:04 PM
Part 5 please :)
Posted by: Daz | 08/12/2011 at 03:46 AM
Hi Daz--Sorry for delay. Doing my annual bike tour of the Colorado mountains which leaves little time for anything else everyday such as answering email and caring for clients. May not be til early next week.
Posted by: Joe Friel | 08/12/2011 at 02:50 PM
Darren Knight--In recent years I've gone to the shorter, higher intensity intervals for force in early base. Doing the climbs in late base.
Posted by: Joe Friel | 08/12/2011 at 02:53 PM
Hello Joe - I am currently 12 weeks out from my race, following the older athlete schedule in "Your Best Triathlon."
4 1/2 weeks ago I broke my rib. I had 1 1/2 weeks off entirely and then carefully built back up.
At 3 weeks post-injury I was back doing the distances I should have been and following the Base 3 plan as well as I could. In the past week or so I've found the whole plan to be fine (but can go only up to 2000/2500m in swimming, at which point my intercostal muscles in that area start tensing up).
My question: Should I move into Build 1 at this point, which I should be, should I remain at Base 3 for another three weeks since I missed three, or should I do a combination ... say another week or two at Base 3 and then move to Build 1?
Thanks so much for your words of wisdom!
Posted by: Wendy | 08/13/2011 at 04:37 AM
Hi Wendy--First, I'm sorry to hear of your injury. I've experienced that also. Not fun. Now to your training, you may want to consider keeping your swim in base (I'm assuming this is the only sport that currently suffers due to the rib injury) while advancing to Build in bike and run.
Posted by: Joe Friel | 08/13/2011 at 07:27 PM
Hi - Great stuff - paragraph 4, last sentence - I think you mean RI not WI.
Posted by: Nicky | 12/04/2012 at 06:39 PM
Hi Joe, I'm not sure this question is entirely relevant to this topic but I was struggling to find a better place to post it! I'm competing in a team recumbent trike race in 6 weeks, where I'll be doing 3 sessions of 1 hour with 7 hours rest between. I've been following your training bible for quite a few months and have progressed quite well, but I've just realised upon getting into some race-like sessions in the race vehicle that perhaps I have been training inappropriately in some sessions for what I'm trying to do. I basically have to go as hard as I can for an hour, but on a lot of climbs and intervals I've been doing, my heart rate has been above my LT of 183. Not drastically, but say 185-186. I obviously can't maintain an average heart rate of 185-186 for an hour, so would it have been better for me to be working no higher than or just below 183 in my training (particularly my race simulations) to improve my fitness for the race? Am I wrong in assuming that I would eventually see my lap times drop/power increase when working at this intensity?
Posted by: Brenton | 02/13/2013 at 06:09 AM
Brenton--There's a lot of stuff that could be addressed in your question. The bottom line is that for a 1h TT you will be riding at about your lactate/functional threshold or slightly below given the number of such sessions in a short period of time. On climbs you will need to go above that. How much I can't really say as it varies between individuals, in this case due to anaerobic function/fitness. On downhills you should back off on power coasting in an aero position in the most steep sections. Good luck!
Posted by: Joe Friel | 02/15/2013 at 12:57 PM
Thanks for the reply Joe. I probably should've explained that the race is held on a closed street circuit of 1.4km, containing only a very minor straight rise in one section. These vehicles can't climb anything steep due to weight, riding position etc. Whilst it's technically a road race against other vehicles, we treat it like a TT because most of the time it's you against the clock trying to lap fast and consistently. I have been using your training bible for my road bike training as the majority of training is done on the road. So I guess my question is, when doing training sessions on the bike that include substantial climbs, should I stick to my LT or just below to build power and emulate the zone I'll be training in during the race? I'm also including some AE intervals as part of my training.
Posted by: Brenton | 02/17/2013 at 03:27 AM
Brenton--Wow, there is a lot of stuff here. I'd have to write a chapter in a book to explain all of it: periodization, how intensity is measured, race details, and lots more. So I'll just say that what you should do is make your workouts increasingly like the event you are training for as you get closer to it on calendar. That will ensure that you are doing the right stuff with your training. Good luck!
Posted by: Joe Friel | 02/17/2013 at 08:15 AM